Flying out. The British Airways experience was good – they were polite, efficient, civilised. They have recognised that flying is, for most people, a stressful undertaking, and have (to their commercial profit) countered this by building a brand image that is substantial, permanent, reassuring. With British Airways you feel safe – not least safe in the knowledge that the extra cost was justified.
Terminal Four at Heathrow, not sure who the architect is. On one side an immensely long line of check-in desks, a series of functional facilities (cafes, bureau de change, information kiosks), long orderly queues of anxious-looking people. Through a central Departures portal and you enter a spacious concourse where the mood is more relaxed, the people informally grouped, the sense of expectation palpable. Along one side of this concourse are the departure gates, punctuated by shops selling big iconic brand names – Chanel, Hackett, Burberry (free of chavs). If the British Airports Authority were to be given the commission to run the Pearly Gates to the Afterlife, it would probably resemble Terminal Four at Heathrow.
Very prominent, and occupying a considerable amount of space, were a series of Harrods pavilions. Not sure if Harrods has made the right decision to dilute their brand in this way. By allowing the
chavisceration (if I can invent a word) of their name they may be undermining the very foundation that sustains their premium pricing policies.
The flight (BA115) took seven hours. Of the cabin crew, the older women were prettier and seemed nicer than the younger women and men. I gave myself a headache by trying to read
The Economist in a bad light.
At Kennedy Airport I had been warned (by several people) that US Customs and Immigration would be rude and aggressive, but actually they were polite, and the questions were sensible and straightforward. There was no unreasonable behaviour that I could see. My fingerprints and eye irises were scanned, which I was uneasy about, but I suppose life must include compromises.
By yellow taxi into Manhattan – the route we took included a view to the left of a large body of water with in the distance the brightly-lit skyline of downtown Manhattan (a view that I was familiar with from endless reproductions, but which still managed to impress me with its 1920s modernity – like the opening scenes of Fritz Lang’s
Metropolis).
To Washington Heights, and a nine-floor 1930s brick apartment block on a bluff overlooking the Hudson River. Greeted by Robert Leiper who lives on the second floor. Robert Leiper and I first met when we were both in the Young Members section of the ESU (he was on the New York Young Members Council, I was on the London Young Members Council). The ESU is an educational charity which promotes the English language as an international medium of communication.
Robert Leiper showed me round his apartment (which he owns outright). It was much bigger than I expected. The furniture was very good quality, traditional in style (old world I suppose the Americans would say). Books were everywhere – it was like entering a library. The only room in which books were not prominent was the bathroom. Along one side of the main living room were a series of built-in bookshelves, supported by classical columns (hybrid capitals). Books were scattered on every available surface, and heaped in piles on the chairs. As we talked books were taken down from the bookshelves and consulted.
The other theme of the flat was fencing – Robert Leiper is a keen fencer and actually holds fencing parties
in his apartment (intervals of food and drink interspersed with bouts of fencing). Foils, epées and fencing masks formed the chief decoration on the walls, along with a very good eighteenth-century portrait of a negro Robert Leiper had bought at Sothebys (the New York branch).
Of indeterminate age (I would guess late twenties / early thirties), Robert Leiper is taller than average, slim build, short hair (very slightly receding, as if nature intended to emphasise the prominent forehead and the formidable intellect contained within). He is of mixed race (mulatto is the word he uses) – in white company he appears completely white, in black company he is referred to as a
nigger (not a derogatory comment when used by one black person to describe another). He is one of those people who do everything well – a keen sportsman (fencing in downtown Manhattan, riding in Brooklyn, running in Fort Tryon Park), a writer and intellectual (hundreds of articles and one book published), a person with a complex social life (including several complicated love affairs with women who seem to be as fascinating as they are demanding). Originally from the West Coast, he had spent several years working in eastern Europe as an academic teaching English and American literature before settling in New York. He is easily the cleverest person I know.
He made some tea (for my benefit – normally he would not drink tea) and we talked for an hour about the new book he is writing. Gradually my hearing, which had had been affected by the flight, returned. We went up onto the roof of the building where there was a good view of the Hudson River and the northern half of Manhattan. Over to the east he pointed out the route that Jay Gatsby would have taken (in
The Great Gatsby) on his fateful drive into New York.