
Above: the Daily Mail today relegated the war in Georgia to pages 6 and 7. On the front page was a report about binge drinking (an important subject, but not comparable to a shooting war). Editor of the Daily Mail is Paul Dacre, whose policy is supposedly "Make them laugh, make them cry, or make them angry". Owner of the Daily Mail is Viscount Rothermere who has (according to the Sunday Times) a personal fortune of one billion (an American billion, not an English one). Viscount Rothermere has said: “The Daily Mail supports the middle class of this country” - and undeniably the British middle classes (C1s) are not interested in foreign wars.
Suddenly a war has flared up in a remote part of the world, involving obscure provinces with unpronounceable names.
All I previously knew of the Caucasus was gleaned by reading a Biggles book of short stories dating from the 1940s and passed on to me by my eldest brother (goodness know where he got it from). In The Adventure of the Counterfeit Crusaders Biggles and Ginger fly out to the Caucasus to foil a dastardly German plot. The Caucasus is described as a network of valleys each one of which is inhabited by a different civilisation, including descendants of the medieval crusaders.
Anyway, when the war between Georgia and Russia broke out last Friday I was slightly interested because of the correlation between the communities of this mountainous region and the book of short stories I read when I was an 8-year-old. But after the first twenty-four hours I became bored by the coverage (all through the weekend the news reports just repeated each other, with no analysis or context). Then Newsnight yesterday produced riveting reports from the war zone - some of the best reporting I have ever seen.
After an introduction by Emily Maitlis we saw Andrew North, the BBC’s Iraq correspondent, on the ground in Georgia. Ignoring personal safety he crawled into the wrecked flat of an elderly Georgian woman and showed us her blood spattered on the walls. He went into the local morgue (staff choking with smell of death) and counted the bodies. He showed us exhausted medical staff at the hospital. He interviewed ordinary people in the streets and asked them what they thought of the situation (as if conducting a survey in Oxford Street). He confronted officials and asked them if they had provoked the conflict. All this was done in an modest and unobtrusive way, the disturbing images accompanied by an elegantly spare narrative. It was some of the best reporting I have ever seen. This is how I imagine Alan Moorhead to have worked.
More: http://www.journalisted.com/article?id=741425






















