"Pro-European voices in the party arguing for a referendum need to get louder and the leadership should listen and act" says Matthew Rhodes (Director of Strategy at the thinktank British Future) in this article for LabourList http://labourlist.org/2014/05/the-challenge-for-labour-on-immigration-is-what-to-say-not-how-loudly-to-say-it/
It seems inevitable that Labour will be forced to back down over a referendum.
And I am puzzled that Labour seems so absolutely committed to on-going immigration.
Why?
It's hardly a core principle of socialism.
And as for the fact that it is "good" (in their opinion) for people - well lots of things are good for people but political parties do not try to force them on the population.
Aerobic exercise thirty minutes a day? A diet of raw vegetables? Regular doses of caster oil?
Is Labour going to include mandatory programmes on these?
So why the hang-up about immigration?
No matter how you package it, the electorate does not want immigration.
Let it go before it drags you under.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment