All of the day the news reports have been full of the Lord McAlpine defamation scandal (he has been the subject of the most disgusting smears and innuendo orchestrated by a small number of left-leaning social media commentators with the presumed objective of damaging the Conservative Party and deflecting attention from the BBC's role in the Jimmy Savile sex and rape scandal).
Now the smears have been exposed as untrue (by the Guardian of all newspapers - and published on the Guardian's front page).
I asked the Institute's library whether they had any information on Lord McAlpine, and after a little while Matthew brought to my desk this volume of memoirs. Although I have only had a quick skim of the book it appears that Lord McAlpine is a sophisticated and cultured politician of great wit and intelligence. It appals me that his reputation has been so thoroughly trashed by nothing more than spite and malice and endlessly repeated lies.
Since the innocence of Lord McAlpine has been established by the Guardian the "Twittersphere" has been very quiet on the subject (whereas up until yesterday every left-wing Twitter microblog seemed to be damning Lord McAlpine with gusto). Tom Watson MP, who started the wave of innuendo, has been uncharacteristically silent on the subject. He claims that criminal sexual depravity and corruption can be found at the heart of Westminster and Whitehall, and yet so far he has produced no evidence (is it not a criminal offence to with-hold evidence of wrong-doing from the police? - why are the police not interviewing him?).
Perhaps I am being cynical, but it does seem to me that when the BBC came under intense pressure as a result of the Jimmy Savile rapes it was very convenient for Tom Watson MP to announce in Parliament that leading members of the Conservative Party were involved in the criminal rape of children (claims made with no proof or substantiation).
If it turns out that the "privileged" statements of Tom Watson MP, the Twitter frenzy, the lurid newspaper reports, the Newsnight allegations, and even the stunt on This Morning (by a former BBC presenter) - if all this turns out to be an informally co-ordinated attempt at a cover-up to protect the BBC then one wonders what is the point of going on with the Corporation.
Much as I like Newsnight, if it is implicated in a cover-up then I would want to see that programme permanently taken off the schedules.
Is it enough for the Twitter baiters of Lord McAlpine to simply apologise for their mistake and "move on" (as George Monbiot, another former BBC presenter, has tried to do)? Somehow I don't think it is enough. Lord McAlpine's life has been ruined, and we need to see prison sentences for some of the people involved in doing this.
An example of how Twitter acted:
In a seemingly harmless exchange of Twitter banter Guardian journalist Aditya Chakrabortty and Independent writer Owen Jones joke about the sexual reputation of a former Conservative Cabinet Minister from the 1980s, adding a reference to Lord McAlpine.
Of course, on one level this was just joshing among alpha-male lefties. Just a harmless bit of fun. "Everyone" hates the Tories so it doesn't much matter what you accuse them of.
But this interaction was on a very public social media site and would have been seen by tens of thousands of "followers" who would have assumed that these two journalists knew inside information about what they discussing.
As you can see, someone called Bernard Collier has even made the Lord McAlpine jest a "favourite" and this endorsement would have been seen by tens of thousands of followers who would assume that Bernard Collier had a reason for doing what he did.
Which is why I think we cannot let this go.
For the good of society, and an example pour encourager les autres, George Monbiot and Paul Mason and Tom Watson MP should see the inside of Wandsworth Prison for a couple of months.
Prison sentences would be applicable if there was a conspiracy to defame Lord McAlpine.
This article looks at the role of Tom Watson MP http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2012/11/harman-i-have-no-idea-about-the-strength-of-tom-watsons-evidence/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=harman-i-have-no-idea-about-the-strength-of-tom-watsons-evidence
UPDATE 12TH NOVEMBER
It would appear that Owen Jones subscribes to the Dr Goebbels school of news management (accuse your opponents of doing to very same misdeameanour that you have been caught doing).







































