"Britain's economy and society are unambiguously better off for net migration having remained well above 'tens of thousands' a year" George Eaton says in this article for the New Statesman: http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2014/10/pmqs-review-miliband-paints-immigration-problem-it-wont-help-him
Note that he says it is unambiguous.
Therefore George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are transparent, conclusive and decisive.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are definite, exact and factual.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are genuine, precise and sure.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are undeniable, unequivocal and unmitigated.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are unquestionable, uncomplicated and clear.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are discernible, distinct and evident.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are indubitable, manifest and marked.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are noticeable, observable and open.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are overt, palpable and patent.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are perceivable, plain and self-evident.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are transparent, understandable and visible.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are prominent, pronounced and coherent.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are comprehensible, incontrovertible and intelligible.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are knowable, legible and lucid.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are manifest, obvious and straightforward.
Let us assume that George Eaton is telling the truth, and the benefits of immigration are all of these things (a giant leap of imagination I know, but let us humour him).
Then why do the vast majority of people in this country not want it?
Indeed, have never wanted any of it.
Is it not time, Mr Eaton, that you stopped telling people what they ought to want?
As you assert, the benefits are unambiguous.
Equally unambiguous is the rejection of ALL immigration by the democratic majority of people in the United Kingdom.
What part of NO don't you understand?
Note that he says it is unambiguous.
Therefore George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are transparent, conclusive and decisive.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are definite, exact and factual.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are genuine, precise and sure.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are undeniable, unequivocal and unmitigated.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are unquestionable, uncomplicated and clear.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are discernible, distinct and evident.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are indubitable, manifest and marked.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are noticeable, observable and open.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are overt, palpable and patent.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are perceivable, plain and self-evident.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are transparent, understandable and visible.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are prominent, pronounced and coherent.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are comprehensible, incontrovertible and intelligible.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are knowable, legible and lucid.
George Eaton is saying the benefits of immigration are manifest, obvious and straightforward.
Let us assume that George Eaton is telling the truth, and the benefits of immigration are all of these things (a giant leap of imagination I know, but let us humour him).
Then why do the vast majority of people in this country not want it?
Indeed, have never wanted any of it.
Is it not time, Mr Eaton, that you stopped telling people what they ought to want?
As you assert, the benefits are unambiguous.
Equally unambiguous is the rejection of ALL immigration by the democratic majority of people in the United Kingdom.
What part of NO don't you understand?
No comments:
Post a Comment