The natural classification of artisans or skilled labourers

Writing in 1849 Henry Mayhew said that: There are, then, three classes of workpeople - artisans, labourers, and servants. Of these the artisans are not only the most numerous, but the most varied in their occupations. The natural classification of artisans or skilled labourers appears to be according to the materials upon which they work, for this circumstance seems to constitute the peculiar quality of the art more than the tool used - indeed, it appears to be the principal cause of the modification of the implements in different handicrafts.



Above: these painters are certainly artisans. They look organised, and specialised, and even seem to have (unconsciously) formed themselves into a hierarchy (from the one stood on a ladder to the one on his knees). These are old-fashioned "working men", proud of their achievements (you could tell they were proud and self-confident from the way they worked and the way they talked to each other).



Above: park gardeners. They must be nearly as skilled as the painters - certainly they would need to know the difference between plants and weeds. But somehow they were less confident, seemed almost shambolic.



Above: window cleaner. Perhaps not so skilled, but needs to have an apititude for heights. The way this person worked was frantic, as if he was behind time and needed to catch up.

Earlier today Gordon Brown announced plans to (slightly) modify the lavish expenses and allowances claimed by Members of Parliament. As so many ministers in this government are fond of condemning "lazy" British workers who will not work for the minimum wage can I suggest that their own salaries and "perks" (second homes, free porn, 88p bathplugs) be set at the minimum wage for the remainder of this Parliament? Those MPs "too lazy" to accept this can clear off and we will bring in people who are prepared to be an Honourable Member for £5.73 an hour (maybe even importing Polish candidates).